RE: RE: Evidence of NO EVIDENCE
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Evidence of NO EVIDENCE

Words
81
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
7y

All thought is necessarily logical (subject to cause and effect).

Anything that does not follow cause and effect would necessarily be RANDOM.

(IFF) you claim your god "cannot be understood logically" (THEN) your god acts RANDOMLY and is necessarily INCOMPREHENSIBLE and INCOHERENT.

There can be no "learning" about an INCOMPREHENSIBLE and INCOHERENT subject.

So it would really beg the question of why anyone would (or if they even could) "believe" in such a god, much less try to talk about it.

@logiczombie: All thought is | Ecency