My take is the ability to control the narrative is on the table when it comes to crypto. Those who did not want one whale hoarding Juno were the developers of the project. In turn they try to make resolve their concerns by having a vote. All this is their way toward getting what they wanted. On the other hand it is a lose for the whale to have to give up the tokens. This could potentially spin into another chain where the whale maintains their holdings while forking away from the original Juno. A repeat of many chains like you listed where forks were done so people had a choice to what they wanted. All in all I think this is a good thing as it allows individuals to freely express what they wish to have. Whether or not this creates wealth is a different story. Forking too many times just dilutes the existing resources to the crypto space. As the crypto space continues to evolve I think there will be better projects were the narrative has to be a specific way is written to the point where not many can find loopholes to get around.