Hi,
You post has been reported by the community. It is not the first time you were reported for this.
deutsch/@stayoutoftherz/newsflash-erdogan-beleidigt-araber-clans-in-problemvierteln-oekostudie-zum-hambacher-forst-ufo-enttaeuschung
Majority of text in this article is copypasta from the sources. Personal thought makes only about 5-10% of your articles.
Also, you just dumped sources in the end or randomly put them in the text without exactly specifying each part of the text is sourced.
This is not the way articles are written, especially academic ones.
Many parts of your articles can be considered as plagiarism as neither the text is clearly put in apostrophes to specify it is quote, nor the exact source next to quote text is given.
Just an example from this article.
The text is evidently re-written or spun from Wikipedia article:
Although you gave the source to Wikipedia article in the end, the text is not your own writing from your head, but simple re-writing of text from the source changing the structure of sentences and word placements. You have not put your text in quote marks highlighting it and didn't give number reference to the highlighted text.
Your articles are full of these text manipulations making it look like it is all your thought while it is not nothing more but re-written text.
If you tried to write something like that at any university as academic or student, it would be right away rejected, and you would possible face disciplinary consequences.
If you continue to write such deceitful articles for curated tags such as stem, steemstem (they clearly stated that your articles do not comply with rules), science, etc; we will have to downvote it if reported again by the community.
Please improve the writing.
RE: Update Gentherapie: Geschichte und Ausblick