Result it happens that two people were walking through the park and each of them got a $100 bill in the $100 bill did not say who it belonged to so the two characters who were walking in that park on that sunny day while walking together and talking and various things to get that bill thought what can we do with the bill? Quickly each one of them thought well let's put it in half and half each one will have $50 of that bill, but as they continued walking they saw a very depressed character in his countenance who was looking through the grass and all over the place, he was desperately looking for something, while this person was constantly looking he said I worked a whole month for this how hard it is to keep the money in my pocket, how can I be so careless I was just walking by here distracted and I lost the $100 I worked for, When the two characters heard this story told by this unknown man who was walking by looking at the floor like someone looking for a precious jewel, they said to each other, I believe that the $100 belongs to the person who dropped it, but I also believe very well that what is lost belongs more to the person who lost it than to the one who got it, and if we have been the most correct thing to do is to divide it in equal parts and in this way we do justice based on equality.
But this type of justice commonly leads to commit an injustice as a disguise because it ignores equity, equity is linked to justice because justice is to give to each one what he deserves not what he wants, commonly man wants equality and that all goods are distributed equally but this is injustice, since there are goods for which no one has worked is very different when these goods are given voluntarily in support in boosting own businesses that can develop each individual but this is another topic, the theme of any talk is about social justice based on equity and freedom and the property of each individual.
In this case we can see ownership of this $100 belonged to that man who was diligently searching the floor for what he had lost, so the right thing to do would have been to pray with equity an equitable justice in which this man who was searching the floor would have had his $100 bill returned to him, for those men wanted to work in equality they wanted to chop and share something for which they had not worked, I know there may be many objections to this but those are economic systems and thinking that keep our nation is tied and poor many times, in the case of Venezuela we have seen how the properties are taken away from many Venezuelans that for many years worked justly for this and they deserve it and it is theirs, but the equality of the rulers that want to do with the people has led them to take from those who have worked to give to those who have never worked nor know how to sustain those goods that are given to them.
Thanks for reading me.