Thanks for “clarifying” things.
I just want to say that I am disappointed about this proposal and how you handled the critics.
Instead of taking a step back, and maybe lower the amount to a reasonable amount, or some other solution, you kept pushing it.
Everyone knew that you already had whale votes, so this whole thing was never an “ask”.
To each critic you reply with:
You never took a step back. You never questioned why community is responding like this to your proposal.
I think it is bad to create such a proposal for past work, without any notice or whatsoever to community. The fact that the community could do NOTHING to stop this proposal to go through is quite a big deal.
Your argument against past work is a no go is just unbelievable:
That’s fair, but I think asking for payment before you actually show you are able to do something is not very good practice.
Come on! This is just bullshit.
I dont know why you didnt seek for consensus with the community, never took a step back. Why? Was your ego in the way?
Sorry to say this, but the way this proposal went through, and the way you chose to defend this made me question about the fairness of HIVE. And as far as I can tell, I am not alone.
I just hope this kind of actions dont destroy the positive vibe HIVE started with.
RE: Clarification and Questions Answered about My Proposal in Response to a Post by Belemo