Thanks for your comment. I understand your skepticism, and I also think that many of your criticisms are valid in the context of Web3 games.

Personally, I don't think the request is perfect, and in my post I wrote that I don't like backpay.

However, I don't consider all of this to be:

Basically, they want to sell 2 panda pictures for 28k... :)

even though I understand and like the irony :)

I have decided to support the proposal:

• for the technical work on the NFT app
• for the code guarantee (custody + open source in case of problems)
• for the team, which includes Hivers who have shown over time that they care about Hive

I agree with you that many Web3 games have failed following the “NFT+token - hype - crash” pattern, but at the same time, Holozing has also shown that it wants to be different:

• no paid marketing
• no crazy token-based promises
• no economic hype campaign
• no bots

In conclusion, I agree that the economic model is still immature and that the risk is high.
I have chosen to support this proposal because I hope that Holozing will be a game that focuses primarily on the playful aspect and because I appreciate the infrastructure work, but obviously this is a personal choice.

Thank you for sharing your point of view. Personally, I think that criticism and different points of view are always very useful and important.