Every topic in life is subject to criticism, and every field can be given an opinion on it, right?
Previously, you needed to be a journalist, writer, or broadcaster to be able to criticize a specific article and topic. As for now, you can write, post and comment on all means of communication and in dozens of sites, and you can express your opinion, whatever it is behind your device screen.
But ... is this a health condition? Is this a good thing?
And of course, the amount of critics in our Arab countries is very large, and as we mentioned earlier, in order to criticize, you have to be a specialist, but now criticism is permitted (metaphorically) for those who give and bear.
All of this introduction was for one important question, or two questions right.
The first: Are we entitled to criticism?
Am I entitled to criticize a specific book? Do I have the right to criticize the opinion of a scientist on a particular topic? Am I entitled to criticize the opinion of a sports coach on his team's plan? Can I criticize anyone who is a specialist?
The second: When are we entitled to criticism? Is there a specific time to become a critic?
For example: When I read a hundred books, am I entitled to criticize books? When I attend several training programs, am I entitled to criticize coaches?
The problem with this topic is that its launch is something disgusting in the social media, there is no one but being criticized by these critics, and ending the subject of criticism may make the fool speak about the public matter under the pretext of his knowledge.
Restricting this subject is of course the best solution, but how can we restrict it?
