It was voted in. What is your take on Jamaican Lion^3. It's from Ganjanetics.

Im in strong agreement with LabLedger on getting pricing signals in review. The numbers for Peer Review suck and its because of socialism in the Peer review process. Check out RAIDreviews.org and

Sounds good to me. Any other MNOs on Steemit that might be interested in this. Still need over 200 votes. Down the wire again. The folks that like it are very passionate about it

Done!

Its back up for Vote- Looking much better this time with a 50% reduction in the budget. Ernest Hancock also suggested I get a DASH address so others can chip in and be on the credits page. Here is the

Not certain how to do that? Happy to do it. Just don't know how?

It is back for another vote. We sharpened the budget and refactored a few things. Great cast with Ernest Hancock on the project- We also put up a landing page for other people that want to contribute to

We have the homozygosity published for every strain on Kannapedia.net

We did hone the budget and resubmit it. Looking more likely to pass this time around but we still need a few hundred votes.

Dan- Hope your DASH proposal is successful. Come to CannMed 2018 if you can. Some discussion on it during the April 27th The Cannabis Connection Radio Show.

I take all my crypto-financial advice from former bankers with bad haircuts. STFU and BUIDL.

I would like to thank Dovetail Genomics. They read the proposal and offered a 7.2% Discount to have Skin in the Game. I would also like to thank NEB. They sequenced ~10 Billion bases of sequence and donated

DASH seems split on the vote. 50:50. Doesn't look like its going to get funded. finger crossed as this genome is a type II

Check out KratomDNA.org and RAIDreviews.org.

We are sequencing a TypeII plant described in the recent batch of 4 cannabis patents from Biotech LLC. The patents do not cover the DNA but I am explicitly doing this to drive more awareness at the USPTO.

Check out KratomDNA.org RAID reviews.org

As a highly published researcher in the genomics space, I can assure you that historical peer review is a total scam. Anon review is even scammier. Very high retraction rates and very low reproducibility.

Share away. Many harm reduction sites need to know more about CBD.

Overly ambitious. No way they can take down HelloMD, Farewell, BiotrackTHC and the rent a office space all at once. Major ADD and too many chefs in this fragmented plan. But I don't doubt they will raise

Very True-