After the incident of Justin Sun, the founder of TRX, the postponement of the food meeting with the third richest man in the world (Warren Buffett) because of the crisis of Justin and transferred to the hospital, you after the responses that came to the postponement, which in my opinion I saw very logical and some of them are already funny:
1. Justin tries to do his best for the coding community when time is tough. Now is the time to support him!
I see that this is not an effort I think is a propaganda for himself and his project, so you see the results of the research linked his name with the third richest man in the world.
2. Is the abolition of food is a declaration! I do not know why people invest in shit trx $? You want to play with the pump and discharge coin controlled by a false CEO ??
My reaction: it is unfortunate to actually make a food business connecting the future of an asset or currency, once the TRX has fallen more than 15%, actually something to be measured on an investment may already be a new blow to the digital currency.
3. I am sorry because this falls into such an unlucky time. But seriously, you should get your professionalism, ie try to have a few ads and your actions are many, not vice versa ..
Your luck is that the encryption space is a lot of amateur. Good investors may give up Yagastin.
I really see Justin as a successful person, and one of the influencers. But I think his illness at this moment is a new one, which may be pulled in his favor at any moment, by soliciting investors' feelings or something. Justin has just become a person Boasting of its wealth and strength, with little response to the requirements of investors who are mainly the reason for his arrival.
4. How to recover the $ 4 million Yagastin, it's simple, TRX listing in a lot of uncensored US exchanges, announced the abolition of lunch, buy more at the bottom, sell back in a few weeks after lunch, profit again.
My answer: This person is the 4 million that Justin paid to win the auction that he can of food with Warren Buffett, and I think this person is fully understanding of the picture and does not need his response to comment.
In my opinion, it is very dangerous to link an asset, or a specific currency, to the personal things of the founder. This is a flaw that must be solved in digital currencies in order to receive more acceptance. 2017 led to a violent fall of the ethrium coin.
Decentralized technology here loses everything .. Linking anything to an entity may vary its condition at any moment makes it central 100%.
.
.
.
