Yep, it's called predictive programming!

Expressing an opinion is not an order. There's nothing lower in debate than obfuscating language to make an erroneous argument which you've clearly done here.

That's the most disingenuous and intellectually retarded argument i've ever heard.

Thank you

LOL Oh I see .. So, according to this line of reasoning, instructing someone to do something is now being equated with violence? It seems to me that when a discussion descends to such a level of absurdity,

That doesn’t align with how such matters are understood. Merely expressing words or instructing someone to act, in the absence of explicit force or threat, does not constitute coercion. Additionally, invoking

Yes, you have the freedom to express your opinions, and the principle behind this freedom is that you should be protected from coercion or violence by the government or individuals, provided you are not

Awesome idea!

Thanks for sharing. Epic conversation! Always a pleasure to have The Palurintano in the house!

How can one ask for freedom from their enslavers when one willfully participates in the enslavement of non-human animals? As above, so below. “As long as Man continues to be the ruthless destroyer of lower

Very fascinating read.

Kudos

Beautiful

Thanks Samuel. Will do :)

Word. Thank you :)

Nope. That article about reparations was written by me. I sometimes use ChatGPT to refine things I've written. I'm not required to state that I've done so in my articles and that doesn't constitute fraud.

The request in question is deemed irrelevant as it insinuates that I have engaged in plagiarism from the cited sources. To date, no concrete evidence has been presented to substantiate such allegations,

This is an entirely original work written by myself over 5 years ago. Please stop spamming my content with false accusations.

The article was generated through the aid of Chat GPT. I referenced Nicolas Tesla's quotes on Zero Point energy along with Max Plancks. Doing so does not constitute fraud.

Most def :)