Hello. A few questions as I consider whether to proceed with an application.
Multisig signing - gas fees accross various chains
Is there a requirement to have tokens accross the various EVM chains for gas fees with the multisig wallets? My ideal preference would be to set up a separate EVM address if I was to volunteer to do so. This would allow a clean slate keeping my transacting wallets which are in Metamask separate.
Ledger/Hardware Wallet
I have no experience using a hardware wallet. While I have considered getting one before I have not taken the step. Which wallet would be recommended so far as security and reliability. It would be ideal to have one in place for thew initial testing of the multisig process if I was voted in.
Alternatively, would it be considered sufficient to have a cheap/older laptop dedicated purely as the wallet and use Meta mask or similar?
KYC
I have not yet, and didn't intend to at this stage, complete the KYC process. I am not completely adverse to doing so for Splinterlands, but regret doing so for other projects in the past, being more identity conscious than I was previously. More points of failure with amount of failures in security that seem to be occurring across the world. Internally, what information does the third party verifier require and what does Splinterlands keep on file?
Legal
I'm not expecting this to be an issue, but has the team done any research on legal implications for holders of multi-sig wallets, so far as implications to the individuals who implement the transactions approved by the DAO, in such event the DAO become subject to legal proceedings/litigation?
Insufficient Treasuers
What is the process if there are not enough treasurers volunteer to cover the 6/11 requirement?
Also, will applications be accepted during the voting window, or do all applications need to be submitted during this first 7 days?
RE: SPS DAO Treasury Upgrade