I don't see any plagiarism in his content. Do you have a specific example? You know what, I don't fall for these fairy tales because I myself have never posted ONE plagiarism post EVER on hive or steem.

I also brought in at least 5 users on hive and promoted this network from the beginning.

However, since one day, when I wrote a critical but cultured post of over 2000 words about how, in my opinion, downvotes are harmful to the hive network, regular downvoting began regardless of what I wrote under the pretext that the user who gives me votes is abusing the @tipu. The problem is that only I received these downvotes and no other user who received a @tipu from him was downvoted. Secondly, downvotes removed the ENTIRE reward, not just the one given by the alleged abuse of the @tipu, thirdly, how could he abuse the @tipu if my posts were not a scam or plagiarism? Not mention why i was a victim of downvoting if he was a bad guy?

Of course, I was fighting with hive wathers about every post and then someone would kindly withdraw the downvote and give it a lower strength so that it would be supposedly "equal" to the tip, but then when I wrote the next one, the story repeated itself and so on and so forth even if i didnt get tipu vote from nayone. It was obvious that it was only happening because I had raised a taboo topic :P

Besides, I had also received downvotes from haters before, who simply did not like what I was writing.

I will add that what I did at that time was in a very good era because I simply wanted to start a constructive debate on this topic, seeing users who leave because although they share their own content and promote the hive network, they get downvotes because someone doesn't like them.

So I know perfectly well the "pretexts" under which Hive wathers and other downvoters oppress other users for not liking someone under a pretext that cannot even be appealed because it works like a hood court:

It is also common to use the term "hood court" as a synonym for a court operating in secret and trying defendants without the right to defend themselves[1]. It has nothing to do with the historical courts of the interregnum, which did not operate secretly.

they issue a verdict and you basically can't do anything or appeal it anywhere because basically, even if you wanted to, no one can stop them.

So I believe in what he says @lasseehlers because that how it's works on hive.

On blurt btw we don't care about spam because for publications on Blurt you pay fee to @null. We don't need hive gestapo ;) if you posting crap it's your choice usually noone voting it. If you buy a lot of blurt and creating voting circle.. well you must firs buy blurts and at the end 12% APR for that is still less than 15% apr holding on HBD soo?

We have diferent tokenomy for free socialmedia platform not for controled by whales hungry of control and power, social media. Additionality some frontend, hosters blocking or marking unwanter users as spammers or plagiarised content and that's enough if they get upvotes from diferent sources that's ok. We don't cancel their prizes. If they stealing someone content lets this person go to Police and deal with it. It's not our problem. We are not a legal institution dealing with judging and prosecuting crimes.

Every FE can filter content as he wish so who cares?

So I believe in what Additionality says there are Communities where community author have mute function for unwantet posts so if yo uwant to have place with high effort content you can have it ;]