I’m afraid APR will be non existent until next bull run. We’ve already seen MTB capital decline by 90% on Polycub while exponential growth is occurring on CUB.
Allowing incumbents to just sit on a large stack of POLYCUB with no inflation turns out to be a bad idea. We must learn to adapt and question assumptions.
Our team was wrong with the inflation halvening scheduled. Simply. Wrong.
No other way to put it. A bullish argument exists to prolong halvenings - say, to a yearly basis.
That is something that can continually be evaluated by polycub DAO.
When MTB was at its prime on Polycub, we earned over $13k in monthly revenue from MTB alone… last month we made $400.
Do we want polycub to grow or do we want to see it maintain a low market cap for the next 20 years?
I’d rather see growth and a true business model emerge, not just using PoL to pay 20% APR to vex holders with no LP growth
RE: Will You Support Polycub Improvement Proposal To Make Emission Halving Time Longer?