After using Steemit for a good few months, its community is undoubtedly one of its best features. So I took some time studying the potential, and this is doubly fueled by one question whenever I'm doing my rounds curating and voting with 
From a financial standpoint, doing so is effectively adding to the cost of improving diversity and decentralization of the network. Subscribing to antifragility, I believe this is a must for any next-generation social media community.
The inclusion of real incentive and motivation are game-changers. But is the gameplan to reward diversity, sustainable?
This write-up are my thoughts on the multi-dimensional qualities of Steemit and its potential value. And of course, I'm writing this in hopes to strengthen Steem as a cryptocurrency. All without getting into the topic of sound economics - that's for others to debate. There's only preference for economic models, and I believe the settings for optimization are not set in stone, but discovered and adjusted through experience.
In order to be able to better gauge the value of Steem, I will try to present my thoughts about it in different perspectives.
Build an involving personal and collective enterprise along with others. With zero transaction fees, and social tools at your disposal. Public utility is an important word here. I believe that Steem / Steemit is low-barrier enough for public use, even to augment existing enterprises. Its accessibility should be continuously refined to become its strength.
I'm not an expert in userbase valuations. The ballpark figures I'm getting out of social media sites like Facebook range from $3.00 - $150.00 per user. For platforms like Freelancer being valuated at $550 million with a userbase of 20 million, this amounts to about $27.50 per user.
Well if you're a regular and have soaked in enough of Steemit - you'd agree with me that the activities and userbase transcend the regulars - Facebook, Twitter, Linked-in, and even gig-oriented platforms like Fiverr, Freelancer, and such.
The fact there are economic incentives intrinsic in the social system enables autonomy, mastery, and purpose. There's a general vibe that promotes the best out of our thoughts and actions. Even without direct rewards. I believe that a more conscious, constructive community is highly valuable.
The value of its userbase could be derived from many forms.
Relationships and reputations built on Steemit enables dots to be connected easily. Everyone is a recruiter, and could organize themselves to efficiently recommend accounts that would be able to complete tasks. More value can be added, if the following improvements are made:-
This is in perspective of gig-oriented platforms such as Uber, Fiverr, and Freelance, along with the view that the userbase on Steemit is collectively, an efficient human-resource apparatus. I believe that the future of work is one that is free-flowing. Everybody has different skills and assets that are valuable.
With anyone being able to build anything on the Steem blockchain, smart contracts or apps that leverage on the metrics and cognitive mass of Steemit, could reliably derive value from its growing userbase. This could potentially be relevant in the gig economy - an extreme example, being able to use Steemit for virtual assistance.
There's a growing number of on-demand virtual assistant startups, like OkayRelax and Supahands. Outsource any tasks. If you agree that Steemit's diverse userbase could supercharge virtual assistant services in many ways, then this point is particularly valuable.
Plus, if you post something reasonable enough for assistance on Steemit, you'd most likely get good help - maybe even free-of-charge. If Steemit's userbase is perceived as helpful and knowledgable enough, one could even sponsor a post or account to acquire enough attention for something to be addressed.
Well maybe I'm overstating. But this is by far the most accessible introduction and birthing-ground / launchpad for cryptocurrency education. What if Steemit becomes the hub for learning and discussing cryptostuff? There are already small-time tutorials and workshops going on.
Definitely a space for improvement here, particularly on the crypto side of things. Like learning to mine, figuring out ways to augment lifestyle with cryptos, and program stuff for Steem, Ethereum, etc.
Beyond the crypto-domain, there's a feedback loop in generating more social awareness through generalists, ambassadors, and educators.
Store functions like Peerhub, alongside various reputation scores and dynamic peer-to-peer recommendation will enable any good actors to conduct business, even if independently. To bootstrap a trading startup at this stage of Steem, it pays to study the wants and needs of the Steemit accounts that earn good amounts of Steem.
As the platform matures, Steemit or some other Steem-app could become like eBay. It could very well turn out to be one of the biggest crypto-fiat gateways.
There's real content here! From travel tips to novels, there's a great deal going on. I guess being able to curate thematically and make the contents monetarily relevant for internal / external markets will provide an abundant value stream.
The incentivized cognitive mass on Steemit enables mindful content curation. This could be applied to both internal and external contents. Independent or collective publishers could use curated contents to reach their own audience, or indirectly improve the ecosystem by extending outreach to other medias.
Needless to say, if Steemit is widely adopted, its contents and curation will become more valuable.
There's really no reason why someone wouldn't use Steemit even for the usual social functions found in Facebook / Twitter. This site is only going to improve over time. Continued usage in many different, social ways are definitely valuable. Too add to that: crowdsourcing and crowdfunding can be done easily on Steemit.
One of the biggest markets is mobility. As work, education, leisure, and travel progressively becomes one and the same, the increasing demand for such a solution may prove to be very valuable. I believe the community and characteristics of Steem / Steemit would be able to provide flexible solutions, if there's a mass adoption to cover enough grounds for mobility.
There are already plenty of initiatives going on around the community to fix problems, and improve the experience on Steemit. This goes from curation, plagiarism checks, to discussions and debates. From the perspective of a firm or company, this is highly valuable for the long-term, especially if you subscribe to decentralization and antifragility.
I could probably go on and on, but it all really comes down to what you want to build together - given the low-barrier, reliable, and loose enough structure to provide value. The strength is with the diverse userbase that's constantly evolving as a community, connected across the globe.
I believe the community will get more responsive and more immediately useful over time, with wider adoption. This is, of course valuable, as it enables individuals to be enterprising in a relevant community.
As I've mentioned earlier, there are running costs for Steem as a self-regulating entity - and this is partly abstracted as an operational cost. There's a general sentiment about the Steem generated and distributed daily are excess, bleeding out of the system while reducing market capitalization without much promise of returns.
It's true that some rewards given out may not end up manifesting in the system. People come and go. Some promises may turn out to be empty. But I think most would stick around and deliver as much as possible. It is up to the community to self-regulate and be vigilant.
The only problem now is the possibility of another crypto social platform getting enough long-term funds to sustainably reward, retain, and build their userbase over time. There's no science to this, but this project will really take off once the currency becomes widely relevant and actively used.
I hope this write-up sheds more light into the long-term gameplan of sustaining and growing a great userbase that could provide great returns for early-adopters. A platform that rewards a constructive, inclusive, long-term community is antifragile as it can be. That's valuable.
It's an arbitrary number, but I think a 0.5% of Facebook's market capitalization is entirely possible (that's $ 1.8 billion)!
Not a rich dude, so I'll be contributing my time and effort writing, curating, and building stuff on Steem - all in hopes to create better value streams in the future. I've invested, skin-in-the-game with a good number Ethers as well when Steem was above $2. Please note that it was something that I can afford to lose.
I just happen to think that this is an incredibly valuable community. Involvement and responsiveness of community members should pick up as the platform matures. That's the real money.
Preface image from Wikimedia. Conclusion image from Pixabay.
@kevinwong