Are you supporting the top 20 witness who is publicly pushing for the exinction of the human race?

This image is simply taken from the twitter profile of @pharesim, one of Hive's top 20 witnesses.

---

Pharesim happens to be the one behind @curangel as well, though @azircon is the one who does most of the systematic nuking of content creators using the account.

Today, I'd like to just focus on this person's profile, because it shows three extremely important things:

1. He self-identifies as a sociopath
2. His profile photo is of him committing animal abuse
3. He says he is a member of the VHEMT - a cult dedicated to the extinction of the human race.

Here's VHEMT's official website, and the Wikipedia article on them...

For those of us who were wondering just why some of these whales are attacking truth-seekers, freedom fighters, and journalists... It sure becomes a lot more clear when we look into the things they admit about themselves - like being dedicated to the religion of Thomas Malthus - the religion of death.

Here is the logo from the top of VHEMT's website:

---

So, do you support sociopaths who want to end the human race?

If not, please make sure you are not voting for @pharesim as a witness, and you are not funding his @curangel project either.

---

---

---

Here are my most recent posts, if you care to fall down the rabbit hole:

• Curangel/Azircon is systematically nuking accounts for political reasons. (as are others)
• A post of libel that acidyo published about me in the comments of the previous post - with a point by point rebuttal.
• How this malicious & systematic downvoting is just one symptom of the built-in centralizaion on Hive.
• A Get-Out-The-Vote Post, including catching people up on the things covered in the previous posts, and various communications.
• A breakdown of all the tweaks that seem most-needed to create a version of Hive/Steem that better serves a lot of purposes for the Freedom Movement
• Showing the hypocrisy of folks giving $300-600 up-votes to 1-sentence comments, while zeroing out journalists & content creators making $50-150 for their work, in the name of "defending the rewards pool" or "over-rewarded content"
• Digging into the actual math of the point I covered in the previous post.