In YOUR opinion it was a 'mistruth' there you go again forcing opinions onto people and onto someone who LIVED the diet for 4 years!

Did you actually watch my video or read the write-up? I never once challenged or really even addressed you, your diet, your diet change. I specifically addressed the nutritional/biological "facts" you were presenting, and I did so by including specific studies, papers, and other scientific evidence.

If I was saying anything about your diet or how you changed it, I would have nothing but opinion or belief to present, and I'm not in your body so there is no way for me to know what's happening. Thus, my completely leaving that topic alone.

What I addressed, clearly and directly, was the false statements (mistruths, lies, unfounded claims, whatever you want to call them) about human nutrition and physiology.

If you want to refute any of the claims I made, please do so, with evidence (like I did when refuting your claims.) That's actually what I was hoping for when making my response, that you might have some research I hadn't come across yet.

Its such bs you sound like a politician skirting diplomatically around different so called issues with my account, even as you point out that if I hadn't of come out of the 'vegan closet' wouldn't have even been 'checked' like a schoolteacher!

Again, you're attempting to misinterpret/misrepresent what I said clearly just above here. It's true that if you hadn't made a video full of dishonest claims (without any evidence or resources), AND you hadn't responded by flagging my content, I probably wouldn't have looked into the rest of your content for some time, and you would have continued to receive the free STEEM I and this project I created have been giving you for 2 years now.

I contributed for 2 years to your curation, maybe not in a huge way but I still valued it and felt really happy supporting something in line with my beliefs, as always in this reality you get let down and the whole thing is just based around more control and stamps down on anyone not spouting the official lines!

I expressed my gratitude in my email, for the fact that your only interaction on STEEM has been to support the TSU curation trail. I don't see how this has anything to do with the conversation you and I are having? Following the curation trail is not something that is required of anyone, there are lots of people who follow that do not receive TSU up-votes, and there are people who do receive TSU up-votes that do not follow the trail (usually because they prefer to stick to manual voting)

This is really is a terrible thing to do to a member who's only fault was they got sick and changed their diet. All the other stuff you mention is irrelevant because it wasn't an issue before this event.

You are either refusing to read my responses, or the victim story you are playing out simply won't allow you to take in what I'm saying. Your diet has absolutely ZERO to do with this. Your promoting unfounded claims that go directly against empirical evidence, your unwillingness to have a conversation about such, your scammy "services," and the fact that you don't actually interact with the STEEM ecosystem are the reasons you were removed. The fact that I wouldn't have noticed these issues for some time (because I literally haven't looked at a single one of your posts for a year or more) doesn't change those issues.

The big thing you seem to be missing, which has absolutely nothing to do with either of our posts or anything else you've mentioned, is that I added you to the TSU auto-voter purely because I chose to, without requiring (or even asking) anything of you, and at no point was there any contract/agreement that you would continue getting those votes.

You are trying to make it seem like I wronged/violated you somehow, by choosing to up-vote your content for 2 years, and then choosing to stop.