I think for most of us, it's not about content that is "controversial," especially since there is no reason for research, science, whistleblowers, and public data (the things being downvoted 100% by the person who upvoted this comment for $5) to be controversial.

The only reason people see it as controversial is because the corporations that run the media, FDA, CDC, WHO, etc have all spent BILLIONS and untold hours brainwashing people into believing obvious lies - even when they come clean months later, the average Joe Altleft is still going to rant and rave and live their life based on "news" that was false at the time, and is now admittedly false.

Ex: Masks, The jab, lockdowns, "too big to fail", WMDs in Iraq, the "Federal Reserve" (neither federal or a reserve bank), The Gulf of Tonkin, Tuskegee, DDT, and on and on and on.

If there are people on a platform attacking the visibility & earnings of those researching and bringing to light these most important issues to society, and the platform is designed for it and the witnesses don't want to change it - then we just have Facebook with 20 Zuckerbergs instead of one.