I see it as the same sort of insider drama.
That makes Hive look bad, because it's got too much centralization, especially in the hands of people acting in the ways I documented.
By all means, go ahead and post and debate but I don't see added value to Hive that justifies rewarding it (but if enough stake disagrees with me, it'll get rewarded anyway)
And it doesn't matter that the rewards were all given away to communities that support tons of people on Hive?
And you know most of the stake that hasn't already voted for my posts (and been cancelled out) is either one of the people downvoting, someone completely AFK, or someone who won't risk retaliation by talking about this glaring issue.
RE: After dedicating 5.5 years to Hive/Steem, I've been informed by KING ACIDYO that I added no value