I think a key issue here is actually that BLM is a decentralized movement.

It is, and it isn't; it's more like when there was Steem AND Steemit though. "BLM" is used as a rallying cry by all sorts of various people, groups, and communities around the country. But it's also the name of a specific organization, which is bringing it millions of dollars in donations, and funneling most of it to the Bernie Sanders & Joe Biden presidential campaigns.

As I addressed in that article - when it comes to groups (especially amorphous or decentralized ones) it's impossible to ever make a "the movement ______" statement, because at any moment, in any place, the "movement" only means whatever it means to the person you're interacting with.

However, when there is an actual organization (like BLM itself), then we can see where the money flows, who the funders are, etc. When I look at those things, for BLM, it doesn't look good. I see a LOT of media, corporate, and government support. I see the money being funneled to support the democratic party. I'm not saying that there is a difference between the parties, but if a person/movement supports the parties, they by definition support the status quo.

Already the "defund the police" call is morphing into "defund the military." And the fact that powerful players are now feeling they have no choice but to get behind it (not because they want to or think it benefits them, I can assure you) just means that this is a battle we are likely to win!

But the plan has always been (at least since Agenda 21 was laid out 30 years ago) to eliminate city/state/national police & military and replace them all with the UN/NWO version - which is exactly what the #DefundThePolice movement is currently being used as the justification for.