There have been a lot of discussions lately — in Discord, in comments, in private chats, on Hive posts — about tournaments, prizing, participation, and what we should do with low-performing events.
Most of these conversations are focused on tweaking what we currently have.
A lot of these seem short term since there have been talks of a tournament overhaul anyway. Some minor ones may make sense to protect the prize pools, etc.
Given how busy the team is, it is unlikely that much will happen in the near future.
This gives us time to come together as a community and reimagine what tournaments could look like for Splinterlands.
I’m sure there are many other big questions we should ask about tournaments, and I would love to hear them and include them.
This post is not a proposal. It’s a conversation starter. Over here, I discuss what a broader, more community-involved proposal process could look like @keeegs/finding-the-flow-for-the-splinterlands-dao
I have played several Trading card games all over the world for over 25 years and played in a massive range of tournaments from local game stores, pro tours, and fan-run showdowns.
I have also hosted regular events, run tournaments at conventions, and been a judge and head judge.
I am currently playing Flesh and Blood and recently managed to top 8 a calling (bottom right) and I will be attending the Pro Tour in Japan next April
I mentioned Flesh and Blood a bit because they are friends but also because they do a very good job. They've been refining this over years. Here is their organised play page, which is a little out of date, prizing has been upgraded and some events/formats have been replaced recently but it covers the general idea.
https://fabtcg.com/organized-play-pathway/
I’ve seen a lot of things that don’t work and a lot that work really well. Some of that will feed into the wide range of things I cover here; read through all of it to have see how the pieces fit together.
Below are my thoughts, and I’d love to hear yours.
I think Splinterlands needs multiple types of tournaments, each designed for different kinds of players with different goals.
Different tournaments should exist for different reasons — not every event has to serve every player. That’s okay.
Keep something similar to what we already have:
These are our equivalents of:
They’re not meant to be high stakes — they’re meant to be fun, repeatable, and community building.
These events are for players aiming to climb toward something bigger. This is where they start to make a name for themselves
This is where structure matters more. These are often run in series.
Think Flesh and Blood’s:
Players can earn invites to the upcoming bigger event.
These events bridge the gap between casual play and the top-level scene.
These will have higher costs than our normal tournaments, but the prizes will reflect this.
They’re also great for building up excitement for the upcoming events.
Higher stakes, bigger prize pools.
These are open entry, just pay the fee.
These would be our “Callings.”
Do well, → you earn a ticket to the big stage alongside a range of other bounties.
Streamed, prestigious, a showcase of our best.
This is where we find our real champions.
Three or so per year feels about right if we go on yearly cycles with sets.
Now, if we’re talking about a real competitive foundation that puts skill above wallet size, we should talk about ghost cards.
Ghost cards are our equalizer
For true competitive play:
If we want to spotlight real mastery, this is the way.
And honestly, Splinterfest showed what this kind of format can feel like in practice.
People still rave about it.
We have used them a few times in the past and all seem to go well
Ghost card play could make Splinterlands the strategy esport of Web3.
I know many competitive TCG players who would at least give it a go.
We now have a wide range of prize options we can use. Some of these include:
Most of these rewards don’t need CP or burn value.
We can be creative here.
I think that all tournaments you should get something for entry, does it have to be at least the value of the entry, absolutetly not, if you do well, sure!
For me SPS should stay on that casual tournament layer where you use your own cards. This is a thank you for owning/renting assets, and in line with the white paper.
But that doesn’t mean we can’t give out other stuff. If anything, as we introduce other prizing into this, we can reduce the sps and have it last for longer.
But the competitive scene, especially ghost card events, could largely self-fund:
Many games use their packs as prizes; this could be a way to increase pack sales.
The DAO could fund the initial prizing packs, which it would receive half back from the initial purchase, but as we receive more DEC we can keep buying them.
This is also a way some TCG players use to build their sets, by playing.
A well-structured competitive scene generates massive content:
Flesh and Blood does this really well, you can check it out here https://www.youtube.com/@fabtcg/streams
Competitive players from other games will come if ghost card play is the foundation.
They will have to buy a spell book, and they will pay entry fees for the tournaments, which fund the prizes.
Some of them might be able to take out more than they put in, but I don’t see that as extractors.
That’s talented players coming to show what can be done! Jealous? Get good?
One idea I’ve been tinkering with is a set of tournament cards that can be used in ranked etc but have a special ability that only functions in tournament modes — no CP, no PP, no economy impact. Purely flavour + bragging rights + tournament utility.
Coerced Gladiator (Commons)
Rising Combatants (Rares)
The Veteran (Epics)
Crowd Champion (Legendaries)
There would be a whole matrix for how and when these cards and their different foils would be given out, but I will save that for later!
This is the part I’m genuinely unsure about.
Where should this discussion live?
There’s danger in Discord, as it can be hard to keep up, and things get lost
Hive is structured but slower.
Maybe we need both.
Either way, this needs to be collaborative.
I will try to get a post in announcements.
This isn’t a proposal.
I’m not saying this is how tournaments should go.
I'm happy to go deeper on any of these topics and provide examples
This is just:
We have time
Here’s what tournaments could be
Now, let’s talk about what we actually want as a community
I’d love to hear your ideas, disagreements, expansions, and versions of your own vision.
Let’s start the redesign together.
