But the same logic applies to main set packs sales. The conflicts start long before the end of the sale. I don't think that is a great reason to vote it down. If we want people to actually participate

I would have preferred to see a proposal to set up a bug bounty program and pay him via that. Then we have one vote and are sorted for the future.

That's only the spending half. I'm more interested in the details of reconciling on the daos end. I'm very concerned if we move to a 2 year cycle. I'd love to see a poll to gauge the community if that's

So this is for a 2 year period where one set cycle will happen? What happens after it? A new proposal? I think 2 years is WAY too long for a set cycle I would also like to know how the repayment is covered?

Do you know if there was much abuse in the past? I personally think lower barrier for referrals is a good thing as that can play a big impact in growing players

I hope this helps. Maybe just removing the $100 spend is fine? I think we have a complicated system compared to a lot of other referral programs which like you said is hard to reach anything meaningful.

yeah why can't you name your dogs. Hahaha,the man is less a squatter and a traveling helper. But he probably does live in a tent somewhere when he's helping out. Aftering some feedback, they won't be that

Thanks for taking the time to reply. This is more than just a thought experiment. If this gets good feedback, which I have been getting, then I plan to do another post with refinements and then hopefully

Thanks for your feedback. yeah I think I will move forward with fewer general boosts. I cover it a bit more replying to @cardeegel above. Land resource skins are coming. That's what's in our future. I

Thanks for sharing the feedback. More boosts is an interesting one. I think we should make more boosts so newer land players can get them. But I don't want to see massive ones like the initial land card

I like the idea of reducing the sps signficantly and adding in decent glint rewards. I may need more glint, but I swear I'm not biased

I'm not even sure I remember asking for this! I would love somewhere for it to show average pp per plot with land cards. I manually do it from your base pp on land cards and using total labors luck cards

I reckon these probably should be posted on the DAO account right?

Great work as always. I will have to find some time to go play in the playground

Nice Post! Are you still after more land cards? If so let me know, I can help. Easiest is to find me on discord

You get things out with such pace!

Love your work as always. Thanks for putting up with my regular requests! I love how much easier you make it to find the data I'm after

If this proposal fails, I'd love to help work with you to get it refined with the community to a proposal that will pass on under the hood. I agree something has to happen, but I don't think this is the

Glad to see something happening. Personally, I'd like to see the DAO receive 10% of the packs sold before the rest get burnt. EG 100 standard packs are sold over a day, and the DAO gets 10

I really like this idea! We could set it up similarly to how they have it set up for the bots. A toggle switch to let you decide if you want to see ads or not. I think that something like this would really