Recently I wrote a post about mammoths, which were observed in the 20th century.
https://steemit.com/nature/@karayanus/are-mammoths-extinct
And I received a comment that a conspiracy around mammoths is unlikely. I'll try to explain my unusual position.
Mass extraction of tusks of mammoths was also in the 19th century in Siberia.
Also it continues now. But now the tusks have to be extracted from under a thick layer of clay. There is already no mammoth bone on the surface.
It is necessary to pay attention to this photo. On a very thin layer of fertile soil. And a colossal thick layer of sedimentary rocks in which there are tusks.
According to scientists, a layer of soil of 1 meter is formed over 10 thousand years. Thus, a layer of soil in a photo of one and a half meters (this can be seen from the ratio of people's growth) could indeed have formed over 13,000 years. But according to some researchers we are told an understated speed.
This is a photo of a gold-bearing quarry in Siberia. All the soil was removed.
This is a photo after 10 years.
And this is a picture of this place in 40 years. We already have a dense forest with soil cover. Thus, the rate of soil formation should be ten times faster than the official data of science. And this is confirmed by observers.
Suppose the soil formed much faster. How did the remains of the mammoths fall ten meters deep into the clay? Even if the soil formed slowly, and scientists say correctly. Anyway, how did the mammoths find themselves at a depth? If they existed on the earth even 100,000 years ago, then why are they not buried in organic soil residues, but are found in mineral clay?
Skulls and tusks of mammoths with bullet holes were found and bullets found in them were found. These studies are made by Richard Firestone of the National Laboratory of Lawrence in Berkeley. Also found the skull of a prehistoric bison to modern mammoths with a bullet hole. In this case, either cave people had the technology of firearms, or the mammoth fauna was already in the era of firearms. I think the second is true.Why? Let's turn to dinosaurs.
In recent decades, confusion in paleontology is associated with new discoveries due to the appearance of new instruments. Twenty years ago, the doctor of archeology, Mary Schweitzer, conducted research in Hell Creek, Montana. She drew attention to the cadaveric odor that arose from the skeleton of the tyrannosaurus. When she mentioned this to Jack Horner, a paleontologist with experience, he replied that all the bones from Hell Creek smell so. The belief in the multi-million-dollar antiquity of dinosaurs was so deeply stuck in the minds of scientists that they did not even pay attention to this smell under their noses. Then Mary Schweier began to explore the remains in detail using electronic microscopic methods.
In 1993, unexpectedly for herself, Mary Schweizer finds in the bones of dinosaurs blood cells.
In 1997, they detect hemoglobin, as well as discernible blood cells in the bones of tyrannosaurus.
In 2003, traces of protein osteocalcin.
In 2005, elastic ligaments and blood vessels.
In 2007, collagen (an important bone structural protein) in the tyrannosaur bones.
In 2009, the easily degradable proteins of elastin and laminin, and again collagen in the platypus dinosaur. (If the remains were really as old as they are supposed to date, they would not have any of these proteins).
In 2012, scientists reported the detection of bone cells (osteocytes), actin and tubulin proteins, as well as DNA (!). (The rate of decay of these proteins, and especially DNA, calculated from the results of the studies indicate that they could not be stored in the remains of a dinosaur for as long as 65 million years after their extinction). In the same year, radioactive carbon-14 was found in the bones of reptiles. Since the rate of decay of this element is high, the remains can not be more than 100 thousand years old. In Canada, on the territory of the Park of Dinosaurs, scientists were able to detect in the bones of the dinosaur of the Cretaceous period structures that resemble red blood cells and collagen fibers. Finds allow a new look at the structure of the body of ancient living beings. In order to find traces of organic, cells and other elements of dinosaur flesh, researchers came up with a special method for analyzing photographs that are obtained with the help of electron and ion microscopes.
These dinosaur eggs are found in China in a layer of clay at a shallow depth. Which says that dinosaurs lived simultaneously with mammoths, but in a warmer climate. Closer to the equator.
In general, dinosaur bones often come close to the surface. But since it does not fit into the generally accepted theory, it does not. In general, dinosaur bones often find close to the surface. But since it does not fit into the generally accepted theory, it does not. Also in the archaeological community, the phenomenon of finding the remains "out of place" is known. Bones of dinosaurs are in the same layer with human bones and also with the bones of animals of the mammoth era, which could not officially.
All this points to a global cataclysm simultaneously destroying and reptilian dinosaurs and mammoths and woolen nuggets and other representatives of extinct fauna at the same time, and buried them under a layer of clay applied. How long has it been?
This is a photo of Nessie from Loch Ness in Scotland. A large number of photographs were made and published in the central press publications of Europe and the United States in the thirties of the twentieth century. When there was no photoshop yet. And the photo fake was impossible. It is quite obvious that this is a plesiosaurus.
This is an element of the painting "Suicide of Saul" in 1562. 34x55. Museum of the History of Art Vienna. Author - Peter Brueghel the Elder. The picture shows several dinosaurs used as a fighting unit. As fighting elephants in ancient India and in the army of Darius.
This is a photo of a flying lizard of the 19th century.
https://steemit.com/story/@karayanus/pterodactyls-existed-in-the-19th-century
That is, there is a lot of incredible evidence that all these relic species have recently lived in small numbers in remote places. If their extinction occurred thousands and millions of years ago, and individuals survived, then they would have time to restore the population size. It is logical to assume that the extinction occurred not very long ago. When?
