And what is this win win? As I have quite a lot of support from many different community members on the current set up.

Then I have a few who think I should receive no payment and just do this work to help the community (while they shit post and get rewards)

Then I have a few who think I should do a longer term just to make it “look” better without actually changing anything.

Then I have some who wanted a hourly breakdown, which I did and added to the post.

I have some who want to see more details of the work.. which I’m trying to accomplish but the nature of the work and the NDA’s make it tough.

Then I have you who says no completed work should be included, which I think is strange.

I have a hard time just “taking your advice” as your advice does not seem to be based on facts or logic. You keep saying the devs should be paid more, I agree and they are. You have to actually look at the full proposals and include the length of the job as well as the length of the pay window. Mine is only 60days pay window, theirs is a year. These details sort of matter when discussing the actual pay compared to one another.

So yes, it seems everyone has very very different ideas of what I should do.. so I’m not sure what your simple “win win” suggestion is even.

And all this focus on what someone dealing with high level work with major corporations is doing and criticizing any compensation... while you all ignore the “authors” making content and pulling out 30k +

Is their content more valued than the exchange listings? I’m a bit confused.. as I spent 14hrs yesterday working on multiple exchanges and it would have taken me maybe 30 minutes to make a post.. Maybe some individuals, like yourself, should look at the big picture and weigh some value in vs value out. Just a suggestion.