I would have personally liked to have seen several names on this. At least another was included. Even if all they were getting was a very small amount such as 1-5% for their contributions.

Like who? The exchange team was myself, Netuoso, Gandalf and BT. Out of that group Gandalf did most of the tech work when needed, I did all negotiations and applications, legal aspects as well as all communication with them. The others advised and helped if needed. So I guess I’m confused who all these other people are that individuals feel should be included? This is simply explaining my own contributions and I did not mention any I didn’t have significant work in.

I handled outside comms, Crim handled inside comms. We didn’t overlap that much so making a proposal for her work seems odd to me, but I feel her work should be highlighted and she’s one of a very small group that made it all happen.

As far as the AMA’s... same people there, while some were asked to be the actual person answering. All questions were crowd sourced answered. And a few of those who did help made posts and were well rewarded.

I don’t know who else would be mentioned in the aspects I brought up in the post, as no one else was involved in what I brought up. We’re more people helping in different aspects? Absolutely... but that doesn’t have anything to do with my proposal.

So while I truly understand the concerns being brought up, I feel people have a real disconnect of what work was done by whom and how many were actually involved. Which is understandable as we sort of ensure it was seen as a “community” effort. This becomes hard then when there is an assumption of what work was done by whom and how many aspects were put into place due to extensive planning, even the twitter response.

I’m not trying to take away from anyone’s efforts and therefore on even mentioned there aspects I took the lead on or managed the majority of work on. There are aspects I was involved with with a “team” that essentially worked as project managers overseeing a launch of project and large group of unorganized individuals.. that’s not mentioned anywhere as that was a team effort.

This proposal is only focused on those contributions that I personally played a major role it, and documenting the time spent.. as well as not posting about it along the way.

I believe stakeholders will continue to reward those in the community who contribute in many ways through the rewards pool, I see no reason that will stop. But also there are some doing more intense work that can’t be rewarded in posting, so we need to find a balance.