Hi @jaguar.force, first I'd like to comment on some basic definitions that I think will enlighten your brilliant mind, which you use to find such important posts as these.

1. Plagiarism: Taking this fragment from Google, the page that everybody trusts, including you, since you must have gotten this "information or evidence" from there. Well, continuing: "The term plagiarism is defined in the Dictionary of the Spanish Language of the Royal Spanish Academy as the action of "copying in substance other people's works, giving them as their own""

Now I want to explain another matter that concerns me very much:

1. Analysis: Also taken from Google; "detailed examination of a thing to know its characteristics or qualities, or its state, and draw conclusions, which is done by separating or considering separately the parts that constitute it."

As you must know, since I assume you are not a fool, once someone finds a piece of information he or she is able to talk about it, as long as the credit for it is given to its creators. In this case the methods I shared in this post were the analyses I made from a research made by two psychologists called Drake Baer and Vivian Giang, which of course I mentioned in my post.

Returning to the central point, and because I want to be as concise as possible I want to applaud you for being a great observer who took the time to read my writings, however to be very observant do not you think that if it is plagiarism what I wrote should appear as such on the web another article? If you google, which I assume you already have done, you should have noticed that the only site where the exact words I wrote appear is on my own blog at Hive, exactly the post you are accusing of plagiarism.

Isn't it strange then that my post is the only one with the words I supposedly plagiarized? And if I go to the page you suggest I got the information from, shouldn't what's there be in my post? Even if the methods of the psychologists are mentioned, it is not an indication of anything, because the order and the texts themselves do not coincide, however, in the same way that they found the study of these two people, I also did it, and in the same way someone else could do it and write about it, since it is a publication that has been made public.

Finally, if plagiarism is then to analyze a piece of information and then share it with a community where its quality content is aimed at bringing value to society, then are those who review books like "The Hunger Games" or "Business Model" plagiarists? Are the artists who are inspired by a Picasso work and create their own, also plagiarists? Or even those singers who make covers of their favorite songs and share them on the web, are they equally so?

I hope this didn't offend you, although I'm concerned that posts like these are shared and even taken to the trendy, I've tried to be as polite as possible, since this is a community of people with evolved minds and who aspire to a better future in which society completely changes the paradigms they've led over the centuries, such as accusing a vlogger of plagiarism as if it were a village gossip. Again, I thank you for reading my post, and thank you for sharing your opinions regarding what other people outside of you are doing but which you think may affect the advancement of a community.

My warmest greetings from Venezuela, I hope to hear from you soon.