I've used CHATGPT for a while and it honestly didn't leave the type of first impression I thought it would, it was disappointing to me because I felt it should have lived up to the expectations of the hype.
Although this might be peculiar to me, until I checked today, I saw that it had improved. Previously the AI found it difficult to actually store search intent and used this intent to create an intent-identity.
It also cannot continue to use your previous search intent to narrow down what you need. It treats every search intent as a singular entity, making it impossible to have a continuous conversation without it actually deflecting off topic.
This means it finds it hard to see a previous conversation as a continuity, and without this it cannot create or recognise you as an individual with actual needs; what you want, what you have, and what you need to add to it.
Although this might be because I was trying out the free instead of the paid version. Someone called it the best "generating image AI", but is it an overall great intent AI? I don't think so (again, this might be because I'm constantly using the free version)
With Gemini it's a whole new level. From a non-paying user point of view, it's seamless, beautiful, crisp. I believe the AI has some sort of machine learning ability, it's conversational, understands your intent, creates an identity for you based on what you're asking for.
When it comes to deep prompt analysis, it is king. It also doesn't throw into your face the "subscribe" limitation at every turn. The major difference is the ability to analyse people, their personality, pattern and this when you want a sort of back based off this analyses, it effortlessly delivers.
This is why a lot of modern day script writers actually utilize it. It almost feels like you don't even need the paid version, but while we think this a bad thing, it is actually not, why?
More users will know that they get the best usage with Gemini even though they don't have money to go for the paid version.
Also there are so many people who actually don't have the first-hand great impression with CHATGPT, and are probably not going to return to CHATGPT even though they get money to actually go for the paid version. I have attempted a lot of analysis with CHATGPT and it seemed like they could only be done with the paid version, I did this effortlessly with Gemini.
However Gemini is not 100%, but better than CHATGPT, I to think it's 75 to 90% better.
I'd have liked to add GROK to the conversation, but I think it's also a bit limited in the sense that it's mostly in-app on X and you need a monthly subscription.
Thankfully I have one on X and here's an image it has generated. Of the GEMINI Vs the CHATGPT thingy. Gemini on the other hand failed to generate an image and a video, and this is simply because it needed an upgrade to function quite well, and this is understandable.
This was created on GROK
I'll have to use. I tried to actually use Grok for some other deep analysis, and it failed to deliver something outstanding, I'll have to try to see how far it can go, but if looks like the only thing it can actually do is generate good images.
At the moment, Gemini is all round, if you need deep analysis and insight as well as top-notch research, then it's the best for subscription if you're going to be opting for a paid version..
