Interesting but I didn't like the stereotype part about science and the pharma industry. It's not all that bad as you describe. Cancer can be cured in many cases, when a few years ago couldn't. Who claims to cure with plants is not labeled as quackery just because it doesn't make profit (oh they do trust me!), but because their treatment cannot be measured. They rely (and often exploit) the hopes of their patients. And behind these alternative treatments, often other pharma companies hide... Take homeopathy. It's advertised as the most natural treatment, the one that can free you from dependence on big pharma, but when you go to check the producers of homeopathic products (all but natural) you will see they are still big pharma. In the US, they even have their own aggressive lobby.
What do I want to say with this? That we must get rid of stereotypes and absolutes. Maybe nobody is completely good, but nobody is completely bad either. Modern medicine is full of astonishing accomplishments, without which, probably many of us wouldn't be here to complaint about it on social media. Corruption in the research system does exist, but not on the scale you imagine ("I must find the result that fits my narrative" - it's not that easy, the peer review system is there to prevent this from happening). Do not let the few bad apples make you hate all the apples in the basket! ;)