The current bible was put together in the 14th century. That's a long way from it's alleged origin and even further if you consider the epic of gilgamesh.

The Septuagint and Hebrew bible would beg to differ.

Sources were from oral stories as well as some early writings of the apostles. Most of the accounts of Jesus were transmitted orally and it was over a hundred years after his alleged existence that someone decided to write it down.

Absolutely! Thank God there were witnesses. And the fact that the 'contradictions' of the gospels is there, actually proves the validity of Scripture. Even the contradictions aren't because of the bible, but because of man's translations and understandings.

I've met many priests who privately don't believe a word of the bible but like the ideas contained within.

Yeah Roman Catholicism isn't the greatest example of truth filled faith.

Remember the Muslims also claim that their holy book was dictated by God to Muhammad.

And yet, the Qu'ran says the Hebrew bible is doctrine and that the injeel is legit. So even their holy text confirms scripture. :)

Jesus Christ is a fascinating idea and it's a shame people don't follow the teachings that are ascribed to him whether or not he existed. There are good lessons to be learned.

I wonder what he would make of the current brands of so called Christianity.

They would be unrecognisable to any early Christian.

Completely agree with these statements because you are right...Christianity as a whole is misrepresented by...Fallen human beings. Which shows us the need for a Savior because we are all sinners.

This is a fascinating discussion, and I really do appreciate the dialogue.