It was just one of many, it was just the most recent one to come to mind. If you can think of anything worthwhile they have done with the $76 million worth of steem they have sold, I am all ears!
Defending them with how they acquired their stake is fine, but it says it right in the bloody whitepaper what it was to be used for, it hasn't really done what it was intended.
Expecting anyone to build on here without supplying them with resources is fool hearty, and those resources haven't really been there outside of a few random delegations and interesting advertising choices (dog park?!).
The reason Inc receives so much blame is because they have the most resources (by far) of anyone on the steem blockchain. 'To whom much is given, much is expected...'
RE: BAT is now on Twitter? Another Steem miss...