Thanks for that. We are in agreement regarding making all votes equal.

However i do not agree with the thinking that it ok for those with the most Steem Power calling all the shots. Vast wealth is by no means an indication of vast intelligence.

My main concern is that once an individual controls enough Steem Power, that person can set the direction for the platform regardless of its wisdom or lack thereof.

To rectify this situation i believe that witness selection should be changed to one person one vote, rather than what we have now being, one account one vote. Some here claim to hold thousands of accounts and some are still creating new accounts so I am lead to believe.
If that could be achieved we could also limit the percentage of Steem Power (political influence/force) that any one person can hold.

I would really appreciate your response to my rambling