A simple answer to your question is that you're partially right and partially wrong, because you're using two distinct concepts interchangeably. Biological sex is genetically determined, and there are

It should be noted that supersymmetry is a theoretical concept employed in a variety of field and string theories which, as of today, remains completely unsubstantiated from an empirical point of view.

Your entire argument revolves around the following premise: if different beings have a different perception of something, that something does not exist. This doesn't seem like a very sound premise. Human

Hello. It's nice that you are trying to promote Steemit during your trip. (By the way, I hope you're still having a great time.) It's even nicer to see you trying to write in Portuguese. I'd just like

Quanta may usually be created in states with some degree of entanglement, but as they get separated and interact locally with different neighborhoods, this entanglement may easily be destroyed. Actually,

I can very well relate with the sentiment you're expressing. I too think we are mostly in agreement with each other. And I also think it is a shame to vote to mitigate risk. It just shows how engaging

In digital form, the year in which he was born should be written as n_3 n_2 n_1 n_0 So, what the problem is saying is that 2017 - (1000 n_3 + 100 n_2 + 10 n_1 + n_0) = n_3 + n_2 + n_1 + n_0 or 2017 = 1001

This is an interesting perspective, but I believe there is a serious flaw in it. I can generally agree when you say that: when you vote, you are essentially saying that you support the process as a whole,

Exactly. It's precisely due to the positional imbalance between economical actors that the government should intervene in order to level the power relations among different parts. A capitalistic system

From a cold market perspective, I would agree with you. But normative economic models must account for social issues in addition to market dynamics. I think it may be very justifiable for governments to

Why the downvote or flagging? The article is well written and poses relevant questions without addressing offenses to anyone. If someone disagrees with its content, that someone should pose his or her

This article discusses a very important issue that both the scientific community and the general public face nowadays. The political and economic models that underlie research activities need a serious

Yes, it's very simple to compute that in many programming languages (I use Python) or tools (like Mathematica). I'm not even sure if there is an efficient analytical way to do it. I have play around a

Actually, it will have to be a multiple of 9, because 50! is a multiple of 9, and the sum of the digits of any multiple of 9 is itself a multiple of 9. This is more or less easy to show. As for finding

Let me try to dissect the so-called argument which you quote at the beginning of your article: We have no thoughts of our own. What does this mean? Like we don't detain property rights over them? Like

You are partially right, but my argument was not specifically in favor of current governance systems. Actuality, what I was trying to point out was that the same widespread personal attitudes and states

Thank you for an interesting article. As much as I appreciate the intellectual ideal of an anarchist society (and believe me, I do), I just don't see in most people the required level of maturity and

Thank you for your kind answer. You come across as someone who enjoys a debate and who can put their ideas in a sensible form. There are several aspects of your original post which I can agree with. My

Hello there! I find it interesting now and then to entertain the kind of ideas you pose in this article. Although I agree that consciousness is an intriguing and poorly understood phenomenon, I wouldn't

Thank you for that! It gets very tiresome to see so much bullshit around. It's a pity that many people prefer hopeful illusions to knowledge founded on rigorous methods of inquiry. Most of the times it