Dependence on Oil
The transition toward an eco-friendly economic and social model faces several challenges. First, we need to understand why oil became the foundation of our economy.
It is not just the raw material used to produce and transport energy in a small amount of space and weight: replacing that energy density in heavy machinery — airplanes, cargo ships, mining equipment — is a technical challenge that many companies cannot afford. Its derivatives are used to manufacture medicines, plastics, semiconductors, electronic device casings, and more than a hundred industrial products. Among them, ironically, are components of electric cars such as tires and paint, wind turbines, and solar panels.
Accepting this reality, what we can realistically do is replace oil as an energy source — though not globally or immediately — but not as easily replace it as the base raw material for nearly all current technology.
The Problem of Mining
Even if there were the will to eliminate oil as a raw material in other areas of production, we do not have enough minerals to substitute it. The mining required to obtain lithium, cobalt, or neodymium — used in electric motors — is, in many cases, just as destructive to soils and water sources as oil extraction. We would simply be trading one form of pollution for another.
The mistake is imagining the ecological transition as a simple swap of one technology for another. The most likely scenario is that the future will depend on a combination of partial solutions: new biomaterials, more efficient recycling systems, reduced unnecessary consumption, and diversified energy sources.
What Alternatives Exist?
One promising direction is synthetic biology. Some research explores materials produced from algae, modified cellulose, or fungal mycelium, capable of partially replacing certain industrial polymers. The advantage of these materials is not only their renewable origin, but the possibility of reintegrating them into the biological cycle through controlled degradation.
However, these approaches also have limits: many bioplastics require specific industrial conditions to degrade properly, and their mass production still depends on industrial supply chains partially powered by fossil fuels.
The other necessary change is structural: abandoning the "use and discard" economic model. For decades, electronic devices, appliances, and everyday objects were deliberately designed with short life cycles, making repair or recycling difficult in order to encourage new purchases. A truly eco-friendly economy would have to reverse that logic: manufacturing fewer objects, but ones that are more durable, repairable, and reusable.
Models such as the "right to repair," modular phones, and battery reuse show that part of the solution does not depend on discovering new materials, but on redesigning the relationship between production and waste. Urban infrastructure would also need to adapt: more efficient public transportation, cities less dependent on cars, and electrical grids better able to make use of available energy.
The Real Challenge
The underlying problem is not just finding new energy sources, but questioning an economic model that needs to grow infinitely within a planet with limited resources. Even the cleanest technologies require material extraction, energy consumption, and industrial infrastructure. If the goal remains to produce and consume without limits, any ecological transition risks becoming just another form of pressure on the ecosystem.
The real transition is not simply replacing exhaust pipes with power cables: it is finding a way to produce that is as versatile as the current model, but that is not a suicidal pact with the ecosystem.
Note: Both the English transcription of this post and the images were created by Gemini AI.
