The past is past. All things have become new. For me, the philosophy taught in universities is a joke. If wisdom existed in the head of a human being that would be known.
Philosophy is not only love of wisdom, it is also a wisdom of love. Now, how can men who do not even manage to love one another claim to be wise? What do I have to do with all your science if I do not find a single formula that teaches me to love my neighbor as myself? What is the use of a man to possess all the wisdom of the world if in all this wisdom there is not a single equation that teaches it in a certain way love?
Philosophy is love of wisdom whose wisdom is that of love. And there is no philosophical system that teaches love in a more perfect and simple way than the philosophy of Jesus Christ: "Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself."
A philosophical concept so simple, and yet so difficult to apply for the whole of the human race, even for the so-called sages of this world.
Philosophy is love of wisdom, but I ask: is it the love of the wisdom of a human being about whom we speak? Where does this wisdom come from which the love of man must unite in order to make him a philosopher? What is the human being who could be wiser than God? And if the wisdom does not come from a human being (note that even Socrates never claimed to have any wisdom), why in the universities, the notion of wisdom is reduced to a certain type of human beings with well thought out thoughts? Who elected them models of the wisdom of the human race? You? In any case it's not me. And if you allow me, I will grant myself the right and freedom to define myself what philosophy is, and I say that apart from the wisdom of God, Father of Jesus Christ, all philosophy is a joke, a cartoon, but nothing serious.