That is a poor reply. The greenhouse effect is a theory which has not been proven and I suggest that the study I linked proves it wrong. Since the greenhouse effect thoery has been around and accepted for a long time I don't need to read it again but maybe you should read the study I linked and see if you feel the same way. The greenhouse effect theory posits that different levels of the earths atmosphere can have different properties but what the data and experiments in the linked study appear to show is that there is equilibrium between all levels. I don't think you realise how damaging the study is to not just the greenhouse effect theory but the entire man made global warming theory if the results/data and experiments are correct.

I've read about the greenhouse effect 'theory' and I've also read the linked study that uses experimentation and real data and appears to 'prove' it wrong. Why don't you read the study and come back and show me where they have made a mistake or where they are wrong ? I spent at least an hour reading the commments at the end of the linked study in which many people put forward arguements, all of which (as far as I could tell) were responded too by the scientists involved.

As I've said, everything they have done and all the data they used is available for anyone to check including you. It could all be bullshit of course but if is it let it be proven wrong by checking the data and experiments. The IPCC consistently make claims which are not backed up by observation yet still they continue to make more claims based on the same models which all assume that CO2 drives temps and the greenhouse effect is real. If either of those things are not true the entire house of cards falls down.