Where are you getting your information about it being proven that CO2 drives temperatures? It has not been proven and in fact appears to be disproven by historic data. There are many problems with the man made warming theory, not least of which is the fact that every single prediction (theory) they come up with is not born out by actual observations/data which leads me to believe their models are wrong but rather than admit this they just change the parameters of their model and run it again in the hope it will tell them what they want to hear (all the models depend on Co2 driving temps being true and that the greenhouse effect theory is true)
If you did your homework you wouldn't be claiming the science is settled or claiming that CO2 drives temperatures.
I'll watch the videos but why don't you read the study I sent to because it appears to prove the very basis of the man made warming theory wrong. If you can point out where they made a mistake or how they are wrong I will be very interested (genuinely)
It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong.
Richard P. Feynman
The science definately isn't settled and it doesn't really matter who has a interest in it. The truth is eternal and what is being claimed by the IPCC is either right or wrong and based on the levels of fraud and data manipulation that has already been uncovered along with the fact that my coastal city is still at the same level above sea level as it was 20 years ago, I suggest they are wrong.
RE: What's Your Favorite Climate Change Study?