How could the science have ever been settled if at some point in the future it is proven to be wrong? The idea of consensus in science or that science is settled is ridiculous. The great thing about the study I linked is that anybody, should they have the time or inclination can download the publically available weather balloon data along with the formulas and calculations used in the study and check for themselves. They can also repeat the experiements. The greenhouse effect is a theory which has never been proven experimentally and it appears that it has been proven wrong by the Connelly's.

The man made global warming theory depends on the greenhouse effect theory being correct. If it is not, then the entire thing collapses.

That is why this study is so important.

Also, the peer review process and climate science in general is so corrupt it is a joke.