Seeing as there is a wealth of available information challenging the theory that the alleged virus labelled ‘SARS-CoV2’ has been isolated and thus proven to exist, I will respond to your points, providing additional evidence @lighteye did not reference.

Concerning the many published studies cited as proof the ‘virus’ has been isolated, there are indeed a number of papers claiming to have done so, and in a CDC study published in June, 2020, the authors stated: “We isolated virus,” and also “made the virus isolate available to the public health community by depositing it into 2 virus reagent repositories.” And yet a CDC document published the next month, in July, unambiguously stated that “no virus isolates are currently available,” so my question to you would be how a virus isolate previously made available by the CDC following its alleged isolation was suddenly not available to the CDC a month later, and still unavailable 5 months after that?

I will refer you to the the FDA-published PCR test “Instructions for Use,” a CDC document entitled - “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel.” - where it is stated in the July 13, 2020 publication (originally on page 39, then moved to page 42 in a December update) that:

“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…”

This serves as admission that the PCR tests allegedly able to detect the ‘virus’ are not being used to identify the actual genetic sequence of an isolated ‘virus’, but rather stocks of “full length RNA” sequences that were transcribed from cultured genetic material taken from patients but at no point purified. At least at that time, there was no isolated virus available to the CDC, which can only mean the ‘virus’ was never initially isolated as numerous studies claimed to have done, including the CDC study published just the previous month.

And as of December 1, 2020, there was admittedly still no virus isolate available to the CDC for PCR testing use, although at some point in 2021 the statement was moved to page 40 and altered, as reflected in the most recently updated July 21, 2021 version of the document, to read: “no quantified virus isolates ... were available at the time the test was developed and this study conducted,” which appears to imply that such an isolated virus specimen may have finally been made available to the CDC, but also reveals that if this is the case, the PCR tests are nonetheless still testing for presence of the originally transcribed RNA sequence or some version thereof (that did not originate from an isolated or purified virus specimen), as it clearly still states.

As you correctly note, however, virus would indeed need to be isolated in order to manufacture a vaccine. And yet the UK MHRA, which approved the Pfizer ‘vaccine’ for use in England, clearly stated in email correspondence with independent journalist and Hive blogger Frances Leader that, concerning the ‘virus’ template used for manufacture of the Pfizer injection, and I quote: “The DNA template used does not come directly from an isolated virus from an infected person.” Rather, “The DNA template ... was generated via a combination of gene synthesis and recombinant DNA technology,” an admission which reveals that neither was there an isolated virus specimen available to Pfizer at the time they developed and manufactured their so-called coronavirus vaccine. Call me crazy, but it seems to me this would also clearly suggest that there was no isolated virus specimen available to any of the coronavirus ‘vaccine’ manufacturers.

This means, of course, that there cannot possibly be a an actual coronavirus vaccine currently available, at the very least not one that is manufactured by Pfizer. But that is easily explained because these experimental injections are not actually vaccines according to the medical and legal definitions of the term, because to be a vaccine they would have to immunize recipients against the ‘virus’, and yet they do not provide any sterilizing immunity whatsoever, they admittedly do not prevent transmission or infection of the so-called virus, and this is because they are technically therapeutics not vaccines, being a form of experimental gene therapy. This is in turn easily explained by the lack of an isolated virus sample available to the vaccine manufacturers to create their DNA templates from.

Now unless you wish to discount this evidence, which can be found in documented email correspondence between UK MHRA and Frances Leader, in the same way you appear to have discounted the testimony of a top official of the Chinese CDC - who very clearly stated that “they didn’t isolate the virus,” and he should know, as the very first studies claiming to do so came from China - this proves, as Frances Leader writes, that the Pfizer ‘vaccine’ “has been created from a computer generated genomic sequence & not one isolated from an infected person, either in Wuhan or anywhere else in the world since.”

This conclusion is evidenced in the original Drosten-Corman study, Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR, which, after summarizing how the “viral genome sequence” being used to identify ‘Covid19’ patients was publicly released by China and made available to researchers on January 10, openly stated:

In the present case of 2019-nCoV, virus isolates or samples from infected patients have so far not become available to the international public health community.

This “viral genome sequence” did not originate from an isolated virus sample taken directly from an infected patient, nor even from a sample from an infected patient at all, because it (and every subsequent ‘full genome sequence') was computer generated, “transcribed” from a partial RNA fragment taken from a patient sample out of which the ‘virus’ was never isolated/purified.

Anyone can claim to have ‘isolated’ the ‘virus’, hundreds of studies could purport to do so even, but if there is still no virus isolate or purified virus sample available to US CDC, the vaccine manufacturers, and the Chinese CDC, among others, I’d say there’s a good chance it wasn’t actually isolated. Indeed, when pressed on the issue, the answers given by authors of a number of prominent early studies being cited as having done so clearly reveal they did not, in unambiguous terms.

I’ll leave it at that, as there’s far too much more I could add in support of our position and I’m already in the process of expanding this response into a more detailed, fully sourced piece, documenting additional evidence showing a complete lack of proof for the existence of this so-called virus.