Got it. You believe your power gives you the right to subjectively determine value of posts, irregardless of the value others see in them. You get to decide what adds value in a way that calls for payment (and usually do so not by supporting content, but by nullifying rewards of content others happen to find very valuable). Thanks for confirming that for us all. You insist this is not abuse, and then turn around and engage in self-voting of comments and habitual voting of spam comments to funnel rewards into your own project off of which you also directly make hundreds in curation rewards daily, behavior a vast majority of users would consider abuse but can do nothing to counter because of the monopoly on stake owned by the few, the blockchain oligarchy. Typical behavior of a tyrant. And that isn't a complaint, just an observation, I could care less about personal loss of rewards, and far more about psychological effects this has on users the platform over, and long term effects of the growth of an otherwise thriving platform.
Enjoy being a reward policeman of the platform, and one of the few power-abusing whales on here who is actively driving many productive and appreciated common users off the blockchain to other far friendlier and less toxic platforms.
RE: Downvotes & Reward Policing: Abuse of Power or Good for the Platform?