I respectfully disagree.
Firstly, your opening assertion, that 52 percent of Americans did not vote in the 2016 election, is factually incorrect. According to the United States Census Bureau:
In 2016, 61.4 percent of the citizen voting-age population reported voting, a number not statistically different from the 61.8 percent who reported voting in 2012.
I don't care one way or the other that you don't like Trump, nor that you're pushing some sort of anarchist worldview - just don't push bogus info as fact, while in the same breath decrying media manipulation vis-à-vis radical politicization.
If you are willingly a citizen of the United States of America, by default you indeed consent to be ruled by whoever is duly elected to any office representing the jurisdiction where you reside, be it local, state, or national. And by willingly forfeiting your right to vote, by default you are assigning your neighbor power of attorney over your democratic franchise, and must live with whoever they elect. (Or to put it in your own terms, you are consenting to be ruled by your neighbor.)
I think you are vastly overstating the principles upon which many non-voters are acting when they choose not to vote - it's not that they are refusing to give consent to their rulers, but simply that they just don't give a shit. (I trust you can appreciate the difference.)
And finally, you end your post with "Vote for no one. Rule yourself." You should know that non-participation in the democratic process is not the same thing as political self-rule. By abstaining from voting, you are not exempt from the same rule of law as everyone else, nor do you escape having to live with decisions made by politicians who legally represent you, regardless of your rhetoric.
RE: The art of non-voting