Thanks :) Here's my invitation link: (helps me earn $10 more XLM after you complete the short quiz, earning you $10 in XLM too!).

Good point.

Kind of, but it has it's own set of rules (many of them different from those on Steemit) and is effectively a RESET on who holds the most power (platform currency) to distribute the inflationary token.

From what I read the new PAL condenser front end has already implemented some similarities of the EIP model that is still being discussed by the witnesses for Steemit.com. Yes, and on top of that it has

Yeah. I use a lot of indicators too, but there's only a few that I really depend on and feel that they're giving me useful/ tradable info. And certainly none of them tell me the precise price that markets

I'm not sure "expected" is the right word. It certainly is possible but I don't think it's probable. There are too many bullish signs for me to accept that as a likelihood.

Nice to see you on this side, bro! Don't currently have any PAL-power to upvote you with on this side, unfortunately ;( And I don't even have the SP to upvote you on the other side, cuz I delegated it

This blog was posted on PALNet, btw. I suggest you check it out and see what it's about for yourself. Pretty cool initiative, IMHO. Whitepaper found in the below link:

Of course you're right. I was well aware at the time of posting this that they weren't certifying ownership of actual shares in these companies. It was a combination of laziness and realizing that anyone

It's kind of like watching molasses slowly rolling down the side of a tree in the middle of winter, but, yeah, I guess I can accept it if it translates into a lot more wealth for me :)

Litecoin halving, right chere: Reward-Drop ETA date: Aug 6, 2019 07:25:16

I had a feeling that it wouldn't be so easy to pull off. Thanks for taking the time to explain that.

I think it's always a good idea to try to be on the side (bias) with the highest odds of being correct and that's where a model like this, that has a provably high statistical significance, is useful,

Now that type of reward function makes sense, tie it to something tangible that almost every Steemit user can grasp. I'm not sure that I agree with the chosen "bonus" (I think keeping it to something

Proof of unique identity would solve that type of issue, right? But is it possible, or feasible to implement?

This may be an older comment, but DAMN, do I agree with your opinion of that version of the song. You're welcome :)

We don't totally disagree, but the solution is apparently not obvious and the problem is very complex, particularly because it (the problem) is rooted, and mostly rests, with human psychology, which, as

@smooth, having read many of your comments over the years, I've learned to respect your opinion on these type of topics, so, if you don't mind, I 'd like to get your opinion on a proposed solution (by

The only problem with this is that they (the economists, themselves) are the only people who really consider themselves to be "experts" and there are a million contradictions between the million