Are all voices equally important? I know this question is heresy in an egalitarian democratic worldview, but we have biases to address. On one hand, we have flat earthers whose opinions are entirely irrelevant to matters of science, but on the other hand, we have an ivory tower intellectual class who prefer status over serious inquiry, and want to stifle dissent. How does Tau, or anything else, resolve this?

It also fails to answer the deeper question of whether any given matter needs to be a governance issue or not. It looks like a bandwagon fallacy with extra steps no matter what. How can we decentralize instead?