This content got low rating by people.
RE: RE: Happy Block 50M + Blurt Under Attack
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Happy Block 50M + Blurt Under Attack

Words
149
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
6y

Hi,

Just wanted to check in on a few things:

  • Do you claim responsibility for the attack on wblurt?
  • Do you claim responsibility for the death threats received during this time?
  • Were you using privex@privex blurt in a box node(s)?
  • Was deathwing@deathwing involved?
  • You simply wanted to destabilize the chain, and cause temporal and financial harm, correct?

And provide a little bit of commentary:

Sir/Madam,

It's a super-awesome feat to find a way to exploit a production chain. Decorum typically dictates informing the operators of the chain in some fashion, so that the exploit can be fixed.

  • Wealthy sovereign nations engage in mutually beneficial trade and don't go to war with no reason.

  • Ah, Hive, where threatening to rape the Binance influencer of the year is trolling and we celebrate the 50 millionth block by attacking a chain that uses the same codebase. Y'all must be proud. Beautiful community. <3

Thank you,
-Jacob

PS: peakd@peakd remains a very nice front end. Nice work!

@jacobgadikian: Hi, Just wanted | Ecency