Wanna know who I feel sorry for?
Not the Blurt team.
I feel sorry for communities that accept @ngc
@berniesanders in their upper echelons.
Accepting behavior like that doesn't seem real wise, what with him running around spamming cocks on steem, blurt and whaleshares, or threatening people or engaging in the various and sundry terrible behavior that he engages in.
Kinda makes communities that accept that kind of behavior look bad, you know?
Certainly, you'll find exactly zero known cock-spammers or threat-issues in the Blurt discord or slack.
We would nuke their access to discord or slack after the first cock or threat.
standards people, standards.
@blocktrades It pays to have, and enforce, certain standards of conduct in your community.
If certain behaviors are accepted, folks could easily get the wrong message and write off any possibility of collaborating on anything, ever.
Software could be built, which by all rights could and should interface with Hive, and spread the hive message, but wouldn't, simply owing to Hive's continued acceptance of a few bad actors in their easily-censored off-chain communities.
On-chain, a good blockchain has zero censorship, as censorship destroys value. No choice.
In Blurt's our off chain community layer, we can choose who should and should not be members of our community, and we do, because those choices reflect on the blurt community and ourselves.
RE: What do you think about Blurt and Zapata?