RE: RE: Filling the Bid Bot Hole
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Filling the Bid Bot Hole

Words
293
Reading
2 min
Listen
Play
7y

There never was any anti-organic fever thrown out there.
Not one person ever hinted that people shouldn't engage more with each other, in fact it was promoted by many individuals.

Yet, my points are not so much about those out there who can't accept changes, it is purely about what an economy is based around and what an economy such as Steem should be concentrating on.

Just like with any economy out there, demand, business, trading, interest, outreach, diversity, flexibility and the overall value that all brings about is what gives an economy the opportunity to thrive and expand.

Wile those who refuse to accept these facts based on whatever feelings they may have about certain aspects of an economy are louder than the facts, we shall be taking one step forwards and then two steps back.

Steem is an economy of its own, with two tokens.

Steem is not "just blogging", it is an entire economy that bases itself on social networking, which is a heck of a lot more than just one branch of online interaction that we know as blogging.

Being an economy, with such a diverse nature of opportunities, we can nurture that diversity, that open and free market place or we can introduce another 1001 repressive tools so as to make it what 'some people' want for their own personal reasons and opinions.

Free and open market place or a closed very tight bunch of people who refuse to allow any changes that are not within their not so diverse and closed scope of views on the future of Steem.

Ohhh, btw, my goal isn't to lobby for the return of Bidbots, I am just stating facts, without any emotions/feelings.

Call me the devils advocate, so to say.

@jackmiller: There never was | Ecency