I believe Tim said it direct to the point and based on what I have read to date about it all with a very high level of consensus from many Steemians:

" I would prefer to have two separate hardforks. I am not a huge fan of the 50/50 curation/author split. I would choose different percentages in terms of how to allocate the inflation (between rewards pool, SP inflation, witness pay, and SPS). "

100% agree with the "not a fan of the 50/50 split"

100% agree with the fact that we need to define the SPS in whole, including but not limited to the funding of it.

I feel as if we are back in the middle of 2017 where steemit.com was the one and only front end using Steem/SBD.

as we keep saying "Steem is not = steemit.com"

Will RIP on this topic for now and keep reading what everyone has to say on it.