I know people, like, worry about what you get from sourcing. But if you, like, if you have any common sense, you should be able to figure out if it's... Yeah, that's a great idea. Let's do that.
I have a couple of questions. Can I jump in real quick? Yeah, go ahead. Hi, guys.
Thanks for having me in. I have a question about the... Back in 2020, the DOJ, they did a professional responsibility. It was the Office of Professional Responsibility.
And they did a report. And it stemmed from the whole thing with Acosta and the whole thing around was Epstein intelligence and all that. So, apparently, the DOJ under, I believe, Barr, did this report.
It wasn't by Barr, but it was, like, one of his underlings. And it supposedly found no evidence that Epstein was cooperating, like, a cooperating witness or an intelligence asset. So, if the current administration... This is in a file.
It is not... I do believe it's sealed. There's a partial release of it, basically, that kind of gives, like, an overview. But the fact that that kind of covers the whole intelligence aspect of this, wouldn't that quash anything when it comes to, say, like, releasing or, you know, people are, like, he's intelligence or he's this or he's that.
Like, wouldn't the administration have to kind of go off of that DOJ report from 2020? Yeah, I mean, probably. Yeah, my take on the... So, the documents that you can find online does say that he was going to provide information to assist the Department of Justice with further information about other people that may have been involved in a crime. The fact that that's in writing and that, you know, he actually never went to jail, I would stress it, right, on everybody right now.
