RE: RE: An Outsider Look at MemeHive
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: An Outsider Look at MemeHive

Words
241
Reading
2 min
Listen
Play
5y

My post was just free form rambling about the difference between the way Dawkins used the term and the Internet meme. If any of my random thoughts inspired a post ... go for it.

The article by judicious is a great example of tag spam. It had nothing to do with CENT or INFORMATIONWAR.

The picture appears to be an uncredited stock-photo and clearly is not a meme.

There is a strong argument that music itself is a meme. Music is a device that conveys culture. But, Judicious did not make that argument. He clearly was just dropping every money making tag to get alt-coins.

Arguing that the use of POB was tag spam is more difficult. Music affects the brain; so I guess it is relevant to POB.

The copyright issue is the most interesting issue involved in both Dawkins style and Internet memes. This is because memetics is a study of the way that ideas are copied through a culture.

In someways, the image is secondary. The determining factor of whether something is a meme is if the something gets copied.

Thanks for reading my post. It was just random thoughts.

The definition of what is and what is not a "meme" is likely to change with time and is like to be different on different platforms.

The same is true of spam. A lot of the behavior that takes place on Twitter would be considered spam on HIVE