Response to tribe engagement metrics

Words
428
Reading
2 min
Listen
Play
5y

I posted certain metrics yesterday and got a terrific response from the different communities. jfang003@jfang003 and taskmaster4450le@taskmaster4450le criticised me for the flawed logic, hence i felt that i will create a different post to explain.

First of all let me clarify one thing that I have huge respect for jfang003@jfang003 and taskmaster4450le@taskmaster4450le for whatever you have done to grow the community. In the reports published by amr008@amr008, I have always seen upto taskmaster4450le@taskmaster4450le and jfang003@jfang003 as the role model for creation of engagement.

So friends please do not feel otherwise.

As coffeelovers@coffeelovers mentioned in his comment, you are a benchmark and it was just an attempt to find out where do the engagers on #pob stand. I agree that jfang003@jfang003 and taskmaster4450le@taskmaster4450le leave 100s of comments daily and that drives a lot of engagement and my yesterday's post was not meant to comment on your efforts.

Secondly, there is no objective of creating tribalism. I am not active on other tribes hence I am proud of using #pob. The way you take pride in using #leofinance.

taskmaster4450le@taskmaster4450le, i have been reading your posts on hive and how much upvotes they garner. So again a huge respect for you too.

But now coming back to the statistics. As you rightly pointed out saying, if I set up a community, put up a post, and leave 100 comments as the only subscriber, my community would be the leader since it would average 100 comments per subscriber?

Maybe this will be a wrong comparison but when we look at the parameters i have given, where we have more than 198 subscribers, I guess this metrics shows how much activity is done by the community collectively.

As the communities grow there are many other things that come along. In case of #leofinance, the subscribers are more than 5000 but the not everyone is active as you are, whereas in case of #pob subscribers are less but the active users are more.
jfang003@jfang003, I accept constructive criticism and welcome it. It made me think when you said that by posting just 1 comment you could be rewarded in #pob but in #leofinance it required an average 13. Completely agree with this point.
Your criticism have helped me to re-consider the metrics. But i am happy that it was atleast taken cognisance by the influencers like you.

Your opinion matters a lot but at the same time calumam@calumam lucylin@lucylin marvinix@marvinix leprechaun@leprechaun regenerette@regenerette fireguardian@fireguardian coffeelovers@coffeelovers madstacks@madstacks charcoalbuffet@charcoalbuffet and vempromundo@vempromundo also deserve the appreciation for creating the much desired engagement in the community.


Response to tribe engagement metrics | Ecency