I posted certain metrics yesterday and got a terrific response from the different communities. Hive account@jfang003 and Hive account@taskmaster4450le criticised me for the flawed logic, hence i felt that i will create a different post to explain.
As Hive account@coffeelovers mentioned in his comment, you are a benchmark and it was just an attempt to find out where do the engagers on #pob stand. I agree that Hive account@jfang003 and Hive account@taskmaster4450le leave 100s of comments daily and that drives a lot of engagement and my yesterday's post was not meant to comment on your efforts.
Secondly, there is no objective of creating tribalism. I am not active on other tribes hence I am proud of using #pob. The way you take pride in using #leofinance.
Hive account@taskmaster4450le, i have been reading your posts on hive and how much upvotes they garner. So again a huge respect for you too.
But now coming back to the statistics. As you rightly pointed out saying, if I set up a community, put up a post, and leave 100 comments as the only subscriber, my community would be the leader since it would average 100 comments per subscriber?
Maybe this will be a wrong comparison but when we look at the parameters i have given, where we have more than 198 subscribers, I guess this metrics shows how much activity is done by the community collectively.
As the communities grow there are many other things that come along. In case of #leofinance, the subscribers are more than 5000 but the not everyone is active as you are, whereas in case of #pob subscribers are less but the active users are more. Hive account@jfang003, I accept constructive criticism and welcome it. It made me think when you said that by posting just 1 comment you could be rewarded in #pob but in #leofinance it required an average 13. Completely agree with this point.
Your criticism have helped me to re-consider the metrics. But i am happy that it was atleast taken cognisance by the influencers like you.
