Im not as educated as you and there have been a lot of messages so correct me if Im wrong... but you post multiple videos and articles suggesting that Ray Epps is a FBI informant...

and your "just asking questions and posing things" but when I ask if you post lies to get upvotes then thats "ad hominem attacks" and a weakness.

Is that right? You dont see no hypocrisy there?

Your right in that I cant read your mind or know your intent - but you can tell someones intent by there actions and the questions they ask:

• Is Matt Gaetz a great representative for Florida?
• Is Matt Gaetz the smartest person in Congress?
• Should Matt Gaetz run for President in 2024?
• Could Matt Gaetz be the best president weve ever had?

versus

• Did Matt Gaetz have a 17 year old girlfriend that he had sex with?
• Did Matt Gaetz take his underage sexual partner across state lines?
• Is Matt Gaetz a pedophile?

Im still just asking questions just like you were but the intent behind the two sets of questions is very very different. You were trying to throw a great man like Ray Epps under the bus with your questions and your very flimsy improbable proof.

You said "Yet he is not a target. He is ignored. The FBI and DOJ will not talk about him. He is not being looked at by the committee..." and then I showed you the tweet of the committee saying they interviewed him and found no evidence that he committed a crime. Instead of admitting your statement was wrong you try to deflect.
So let me ask you about probability then...

You said that the evidence against Ray Epps is "pretty damning" - but all Ive seen is glimpses of videos of him saying things that everyone was saying. Are you saying that those glimpses of videos make it more likely that hes FBI than the evidence of:

• A public statement by the investigating committee that hes not FBI and committed no crimes
• Over a decade with the Oathkeepers
• Thousands of people who know him and trust him as a real patriot

Did you ask any Trump supporters who know Ray what they think before posting this hit piece disguised as "questions"?

Why shouldnt I be upset that your trying to label Ray as FBI? Why did you edit your comment after I already responded was it to make me look dumb? You said that there is a "VAST disparity between how Epps was approached" - what is that VAST disparity? Most people have been questioned by the FBI and Epps was questioned by the FBI and the committee because he is a senior with the Oathkeepers. What is that VAST disparity?

Also I ask again since you ignored me last time what evidence do you have that Ray Epps committed a crime?