I guess we're stating facts.
Like how your proposal has been around since 2020-11-12. During that time, your proposal was exposed to the risk of under payment, if the peg fell below the target. Proposals were also subject to small underpayments due to a bug.
It is unlikely that these two risks would have been compensated, and they are (mostly) understood when a proposal is created. It's just the way proposals are.
It's too bad there's a double-standard.
RE: HiveSQL proposal unfunded - Information and reaction